With the UPC now established, its impact on national litigation in key life sciences jurisdictions is becoming clearer. This session examines how the UPC’s decisions intersect with proceedings in the UK, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the US. Speakers will explore recent cases, including BSH v. Electrolux and Fujifilm v. Kodak, assessing the reach of the UPC, divergence in substantive law, and the evolving balance between national and supranational enforcement.
- Discuss the impact of early UPC rulings on litigation strategies in the UK, France, Germany, and the Netherlands
- Analyse the long-arm reach of the UPC and lessons from cases such as BSH v. Electrolux and Fujifilm v. Kodak
- Compare how national courts and the UPC apply substantive law in overlapping disputes
- Evaluate strategic considerations for coordinating litigation in the UPC versus national and US courts
Mike Gilbert
Mike Gilbert is a partner at Marks & Clerk in London. He is an Intellectual Property (IP) lawyer who advises clients in a wide variety of business sectors on issues including litigation and dispute resolution, IP strategy and risk limitation, due diligence projects and commercial and licensing transactions involving IP. His primary focus and expertise, however, lies in life sciences patent litigation where he is considered to be one of the UK’s leading practitioners. He has represented some of the world’s leading biopharmaceutical corporations in complex patent and technical disputes including Genentech, Roche, Chugai, Pfizer, Wyeth, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Daiichi Sankyo, AbbVie, Amgen and Illumina to name but a few. Mike is well known for his strategic and creative vision and is consistently recommended in various legal directories including the World IP Review, Legal 500, Who's Who Legal and the IAM Patent 1000 guide, which describe him as “always at the top of the pile, especially for pharmaceutical matters”. Mike graduated from Cambridge University in 1989 with a degree in chemical engineering.
